Do you think advertisers have a moral duty to avoid stereotyping people?
I believe that advertisers should have a moral duty to avoid stereotyping, especially as it can become offensive or have negative impact. On the other hand, this is the way companies make their money. Generally, their only duty is to advertise a product in order to have people purchase it, and if people are offended by an advert, they will be less likely to buy this product. It is important that the general audience is persuaded appropriately so that the company can gain more sales. Advertisers must consider the ethical and moral impact on the company. They tend to include stereotypes and take advantage of these. In today's society, our current generation will not take many stereotypes as offensive, however, the older generation tends to do so. Therefore, a large part of the audience would assume that the company promotes immoral and close minded beliefs. By advertising a product with a norm aimed towards people who do not fit this, the audience can disagree with the content of the advertisement and thereby causing them to question the credibility of the advert. It will decrease sales, as the audience purchasing a product might feel they will contribute to promote the beliefs behind stereotyping. Overall, advertising companies care most about making money and profit, and if they can only accomplish this by picking at (considered to be) 'flaws', then they surely will. If advertises do not consider the ethical and social impact of stereotyping, their product sales will not be successful. This means that the advertisers have essentially failed in their role to positively advertise a certain products using the correct appeals and persuasive language.