Letter to the editor: Sarah E. Needleman
Dear Mrs. Needleman,
I have heard enough to say that I completely agree with the argument suggesting that applicants use a ‘’too-casual tone of textspeak’’ inappropriately. Even though technology and the wide spreading of texts develops and evolves every single day, it should not be applied in job applications or formal emails. I agree with the argument that ‘’they hint at immaturity and questionable argument.’’ As referred to in your article, the younger and the older generation might indeed face difficulty within. It certainly is unprofessional for a candidate to send a ‘’friend invite’’ to their boss soon after the interview. Once a candidate has been given the job, they must remain professional. When friendly relations at work start the develop after a few weeks or months, it will perhaps become suitable for sending a friend request.
However, I must say that I do not agree with every statement mentioned in the article, specifically that use of such language is ‘’perceived to be disrespectful.’’ For the purpose of an interview or email, their use of language is inappropriate but not disrespectful. Secondly, it should not be an issue when receiving an email that was ‘’sent from my blackberry or iPhone’’. We live in a society where technology is yet to develop, meaning that mobile phones have become a major part of our lives. Candidates are making the fastest, easiest, and best use out of them. Candidates tend to use text-speaking as an informal way of communicating, and it needs to be thought of before applying it. Lastly, I disagree with the argument ‘’If I’m going to give you a job, do I really want you communicating to our clients in this fashion? No.’’ Do you really believe that the way one uses language is going to determine their ability of communicating with clients? This should be looked at in action, before making a judgement.
Thank you for your time,
Sophie Huijskens
